73 Strings vs Aumni (J.P. Morgan)
A side-by-side comparison of 73 Strings and Aumni (J.P. Morgan) — two options for data & market intelligence. Pricing, features, and honest pros and cons.
Category
Data & Market Intelligence
Legal & Compliance
Rating
4.3 / 5
4.4 / 5
Pricing
Enterprise / Custom
Enterprise / Custom
Best for
Growth and multi-stage funds industrializing fair-value marks
Funds with 30+ positions that need structured visibility into their rights and terms
Key features
- AI extraction from financials, decks and reports
- Automated recurring fair-value marks
- Audit-ready valuation documentation
- Continuous portfolio monitoring data
- Coverage across PE, credit, growth and venture
- AI plus attorney-reviewed extraction of deal terms from closing docs
- Fund-wide dashboards on preferences, pro rata, and ownership
- Term benchmarking against a large venture transaction dataset
- Waterfall-relevant data for valuations and exits
- Audit, tax, and LP reporting support
Pros
- Cuts quarterly valuation cycles dramatically
- Audit trail satisfies increasingly demanding LPs and auditors
- Blue-chip institutional backing and client base
- Solves the real problem that most funds cannot query their own deal terms
- Human-verified extraction accuracy suitable for audit workflows
- J.P. Morgan ownership brings staying power and data depth
Cons
- Overbuilt for small funds marking a handful of positions
- Enterprise sales cycle and pricing
- Value scales with portfolio size — light for sub-20-position funds
- Enterprise pricing and sales cycle
- Now tied to the J.P. Morgan ecosystem, which some GPs weigh carefully