AlternativeSoft vs CEPRES
A side-by-side comparison of AlternativeSoft and CEPRES — two options for lp reporting & investor relations. Pricing, features, and honest pros and cons.
Category
LP Reporting & Investor Relations
LP Reporting & Investor Relations
Rating
4.1 / 5
4.3 / 5
Pricing
Enterprise / Custom
Enterprise / Custom
Best for
Fund-of-funds and allocator teams selecting managers systematically
LPs underwriting managers and GPs proving track records with data
Key features
- Unified database spanning 500,000+ mutual, hedge and PE funds
- Screening with 4,000+ quantitative criteria and peer benchmarking
- Portfolio construction with optimization and stress testing
- AI-powered due diligence questionnaire automation
- Automated branded reporting and fact sheets
- Verified deal and fund performance database via direct GP exchange
- DealForge deal analytics and benchmarking
- Fund screening, due diligence and portfolio forecasting
- AInsights AI layer for private-markets queries
- Cash-flow modeling and scenario analysis
Pros
- Consolidates the major fund databases into one screening layer
- Two decades of trust with pensions, endowments and consultants
- ODD automation genuinely shortens manager-selection cycles
- Gross, deal-level data most benchmark providers simply lack
- Trusted intermediary status opens data LPs cannot get elsewhere
- Useful on both sides of the fundraise conversation
Cons
- Built for allocators — GPs get read-only insight into the process
- Coverage skews to hedge funds and liquid alternatives over early-stage VC
- Buyout coverage is deeper than early-stage venture
- Meaningful subscription cost for smaller managers