Crowdcube vs OurCrowd
A side-by-side comparison of Crowdcube and OurCrowd — two options for deal flow & sourcing. Pricing, features, and honest pros and cons.
Category
Deal Flow & Sourcing
Deal Flow & Sourcing
Rating
4.1 / 5
4.1 / 5
Pricing
~1.5% investor fee
Mgmt fees + carry
Best for
Consumer investors tracking community-driven European brands
Accredited investors building a self-directed venture portfolio
Key features
- Equity campaigns from UK and European private companies
- Retail and professional investor participation
- Secondary liquidity windows via Cubex
- Nominee structure that keeps cap tables clean
- Campaign data: valuation, traction, investor count
- Curated single-deal access with platform co-investment
- Sector and index-style venture funds
- Institutional-grade diligence materials per deal
- Portfolio reporting and investor events
- Strong Israeli and deep-tech deal flow
Pros
- Crowd demand is a genuine consumer-brand signal
- Nominee structure makes crowd rounds palatable to later VCs
- Deep archive of European early-stage raise data
- Platform invests its own capital alongside members
- Deal-by-deal choice unlike blind-pool funds
- Access to rounds individuals rarely see directly
Cons
- Campaign valuations often run rich versus VC-priced rounds
- Diligence materials are founder-authored marketing documents
- Layered fees and carry dilute net returns
- Allocation in hot deals can be limited